首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Flow Scheduling Policies for Mix of Regular and Deadline Traffic in Datacenter Environments
【2h】

Comparison of Flow Scheduling Policies for Mix of Regular and Deadline Traffic in Datacenter Environments

机译:常规与期限混合的流量调度策略比较   数据中心环境中的流量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Datacenters are the main infrastructure on top of which cloud computingservices are offered. Such infrastructure may be shared by a large number oftenants and applications generating a spectrum of datacenter traffic. Delaysensitive applications and applications with specific Service Level Agreements(SLAs), generate deadline constrained flows, while other applications initiateflows that are desired to be delivered as early as possible. As a result,datacenter traffic is a mix of two types of flows: deadline and regular. Thereare several scheduling policies for either traffic type with focus onminimizing completion times or deadline miss rate. In this report, we applyseveral scheduling policies to mix traffic scenario while varying the ratio ofregular to deadline traffic. We consider FCFS (First Come First Serve), SRPT(Shortest Remaining Processing Time) and Fair Sharing as deadline agnosticapproaches and a combination of Earliest Deadline First (EDF) with either FCFSor SRPT as deadline-aware schemes. In addition, for the latter, we considerboth cases of prioritizing deadline traffic (Deadline First) and prioritizingregular traffic (Deadline Last). We study both light-tailed and heavy-tailedflow size distributions and measure mean, median and tail flow completion times(FCT) for regular flows along with Deadline Miss Rate (DMR) and averagelateness for deadline flows. We also consider two operation regimes oflightly-loaded (low utilization) and heavily-loaded (high utilization). We findthat performance of deadline-aware schemes is highly dependent on fraction ofdeadline traffic. With light-tailed flow sizes, we find that FCFS performsbetter in terms of tail times and average lateness while SRPT performs betterin average times and deadline miss rate. For heavy-tailed flow sizes, exceptfor tail times, SRPT performs better in all other metrics.
机译:数据中心是提供云计算服务的主要基础架构。大量的常客和产生大量数据中心流量的应用程序可能会共享这种基础架构。时延敏感的应用程序和具有特定服务水平协议(SLA)的应用程序会生成截止日期受约束的流,而其他应用程序则启动希望尽早交付的流。结果,数据中心流量是两种类型的流量的混合:截止期限和常规流量。对于这两种流量类型,有几种调度策略,重点是最小化完成时间或截止期限未命中率。在此报告中,我们应用多种调度策略来混合流量情况,同时更改常规流量与截止时间流量的比率。我们将FCFS(先到先服务),SRPT(最短剩余处理时间)和公平共享视为截止日期不可知的方法,将最早截止日期优先(EDF)与FCFS或SRPT结合起来用作截止日期感知方案。此外,对于后者,我们考虑了两种情况:优先级截止流量(截止日期优先)和优先级常规流量(截止时间截止)。我们研究了轻尾流和重尾流的大小分布,并测量了常规流的均值,中值和尾流完成时间(FCT)以及截止期限错率(DMR)和平均流。我们还考虑了轻载(低利用率)和重载(高利用率)两种运行方式。我们发现,了解截止期限的方案的性能高度依赖于截止期限流量的一部分。使用轻尾流大小,我们发现FCFS在拖尾时间和平均延迟方面表现更好,而SRPT在平均时间和截止期限未命中率方面表现更好。对于重尾流量,除尾部时间外,SRPT在所有其他指标中均表现更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号